It would be logical to except that the discovery of fission was the authoritative answer to nuclear science. It would be normal also to accept that no single individual could really claim to be its "inventor," since it is a natural physical process, and required the efforts of many thousands to write it into existence. Countless descriptions of the origin of atomic decay were theorized. Since the advent of the atomic chain reaction nuclear science has been written into scientific law. However, this is not absolute and surely is not correct according to what we now know.

The concept of "invention" does not generally require the physical proof of the invented thing. This fact is clearly recognized by patent law, it does not require a working model in order to get a patent awarded. It is common for inventions to require additional discoveries and developments before an actual prototype can be made. In these cases, an invention may fairly have more than one inventor - the originator of the principle idea, and the individual who actually made the first workable model.

In the case of the Perreault Atomic Model there is clearly one man who is the originator of this newly born nuclear science. He is a catalyst to an emerging science that will ultimately lead to the successful construction of radiant energy power generators and is the principal investigator in the early T.H. Moray Radiant Energy discoveries - making a number of new key discoveries himself. By any normal standard this man is the discoverer of a revised nuclear standard that promises to open new roads to invention and discovery. This man is Bruce A. Perreault.